Left Coast Strikes Again

This week’s radio commentary…

We don’t call California the “left coast” for nothing.  The Golden State works hard to maintain its standing as one of the top two or three most liberal states.  Unfortunately, what happens in California rarely stays there—and one of these days what starts there wends its way to the Midwest and beyond.

Last week, California Governor Jerry Brown proved my point when he signed into law a bill that requires all forms of public schools in that state to teach what is essentially “gay history.”  The so-called FAIR bill, an acronym for “Fair, Accurate, Inclusive and Respectful,” is supposedly an attempt to update California’s existing law that requires schools to include certain specific groups of people in their instruction, noting their contributions to the history and culture of the state and nation.

According to an analysis by the California legislature, the bill “adds lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender…Americans, persons with disabilities and others to the list of groups of people whose role and contributions shall be accurately portrayed in instructional materials and included in social science instruction, and adds sexual orientation and religion to the list of characteristics that shall not be reflected adversely in adopted instructional materials.”

So, for the first time ever in the United States a state legislature has passed into law a requirement that no school district can adopt a textbook that adversely reflects on homosexuality.  Apparently, it’s more important to the State of California that the textbooks they adopt and the other instructional materials their teachers use don’t somehow negatively reflect on gays than it is that the books and materials do a good job of teaching history.

Who decides what “reflected adversely” means during textbook adoption and materials selection?  Really.  Just what does that term mean when it comes to making a decision on textbook adoption?  Is it adversely reflecting if the book mentions that some religions don’t approve of same-sex marriage or of homosexual behavior?  Or how about stating that male homosexuals have the highest rates of HIV/AIDs and the numbers are climbing?  Or maybe noting that many people who have practiced homosexuality have successfully left that lifestyle?   Just who is going to make those decisions?  Given that this is California, I’m betting that the decision makers likely aren’t conservative Christians.

But the bill goes beyond this.  It requires that gay history be taught.  According to reports, the state will draw up the guidelines for this addition for the school districts; and then “educators” will determine who gets included and at what grade levels this information is taught.

I can just see the next generation of textbooks with special sections on actors such as Heath Ledger, Rosie O’Donnell, Ellen Degeneres, and politicians such as Harvey Milk, maybe Tammy Baldwin and Barney Frank, and maybe even open homosexual millionaire Tim Gill who personally funds and utilizes his vast network to make sure pro-homosexual state legislators get elected around the country.  The homosexuals argue some of these people are as important as Martin Luther King Jr.

For the first time, history textbooks will feature people not for what they have accomplished or contributed to our country and society, but because of their sexual orientation.

California’s decision won’t remain in California.  For starters, textbook publishers don’t typically create different textbooks for each state.  They try to comply with what the largest states have mandated—states such as Texas and California.  Many other smaller states then get pressured into using textbooks and materials written for California, which now will feature gay history. And it won’t stop there.  One of these days a state legislator here in Wisconsin will think what California did is just great and will introduce a bill to do the same thing in our state.

This new law isn’t about teaching history; it’s about indoctrination.  It’s about normalizing and affirming homosexuality.  It’s about filling young, impressionable students with wrong and even harmful information that homosexuality is normal and should be celebrated.  It’s also about violating the students’ and their parents’ religious liberty.

We know if it happens in California, it can happen here.  Parents, be vigilant, be proactive, be involved.  Ask questions. Investigate.  Examine the textbooks your children are using. Take nothing, absolutely nothing, for granted about your public schools or the laws coming out of Madison.  It’s the only way you can protect your children from the long reach of California.

This is Julaine Appling for Wisconsin Family Council reminding you the Prophet Hosea said, “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge.”

Listen to/download the mp3 file

Feingold & Kohl approve–again–two-time loser Louis Butler

Yesterday, the US Senate Judiciary Committee  on a 12-7 partisan vote approved former Wisconsin State Supreme Court Justice Louis Butler as a federal district judge. Both of Wisconsin’s senators, Russ Feingold (D) and Herb Kohl (D) are on the Judiciary Committee and both voted for Butler and several other Obama nominees.  The full Senate will likely sit for quite awhile before acting on these nominees.

This is the second time Feingold and Kohl have voted to approve Butler for this position. As a matter of record, yes, Butler is the former Milwaukee County judge who ran for the State Supreme Court in 2000 and was soundly defeated by Diane Sykes.   In 2004, when Sykes took a federal judgeship, Gov. Jim Doyle appointed Butler to the State Supreme Court–a position incumbent Justice Butler managed to lose in 2008 when challenger Justice Mike Gableman beat him.

So, now Feingold and Kohl have given this two-time loser–a judge “we the people” keep rejecting–yet another opportunity for a lifetime appointment.  Obviously, Feingold and Kohl care more about party unity than representing their constituents.  Yet another glaring example of what’s wrong with our government.

Media lauds suspect “study” on same-sex parenting

Late yesterday afternoon, a reporter from Channel 27 in Madison called our office and wanted a comment on a story about a study that was released recently supposedly showing that  children conceived through “sperm donors” with lesbian parents excel in comparison to their counterparts in heterosexual families.  We told the reporter that we had not seen the study and were not in a position to comment.

Channel 27 ran the story last night.  Meanwhile, we did our research–with superb help from our great friends and associates at Focus on the Family (in this instance, a blogger/policy expert for Focus’s CitizenLink) and Family Research Council (Tony Perkin’s Washington Update).  Here’s some of what we have found:

  • The study was published in the journal Pediatrics and done by the Williams Institute (also referred to at times as the UCLA Foundation), an organization dedicated to advancing the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) agenda.   It is heavily funded by the Gill Foundation, a foundation that exclusively supports LGBT efforts.  Tim Gill is an open homosexual who made his fortune in the software industry (Quark) and is now giving his time and money to promoting homosexuality through his foundation and through his political work in state government across the country (e.g., flipping Wisconsin’s State Assembly in 2008).
  • The study’s sample  is not random, is not representative, and is very small. (Lesbian mothers volunteered, and represented only the following geographic areas:  Boston, Washington, D.C., San Francisco.)
  • The data were gathered essentially from the mothers themselves and from interviews and questionnaires completed by the children, making the data highly suspect.   (Really.  I”m not making this up.  Quoting from page 1 of the study itself, under heading “Results”:  “According to their mothers’ reports…” )
  • The assumptions are faulty.  They assume two mothers does not affect children; any behavioral or psychosocial problems are attributed to “stigmatization.”
  • The study basically says men are unnecessary in parenting, in spite of what research continues to show is in the best interest of children–to be reared by their married mother and father.
  • The study ignores (hardly surprising) research released last week that shows that children conceived through “sperm donation” have some significant issues and such children who are in the homes of two lesbian women reported that, among other things, they believe it is wrong to intentionally conceive a fatherless child.

You be the judge.  Watch what Channel 27 did with the story–and see if you think they lauded the study or handled it for what it really is–pretty laughable because of its shoddy scientific approach.  But that happens when you set out to do “research” that proves your point.

Apologizing to China…for immigration laws!?

By now I’m sure you’ve heard about the Obama Administration’s “human-rights talks” (which went nowhere) with China’s Communist government leaders.  Apparently, Obama apologized to China in response to “Chinese complaints about problems with U.S. human rights, which have included crime, poverty, homelessness and racial discrimination.”

Let me see if I got that right…crime, poverty, homelessness and racial discrimination?!  And China can accuse us of these “human rights violations,” because of their stellar record on human rights?  I don’t think so.  China is at the top of just about every human rights violation list:

  • Voice of the Martyrs: China has 13 prisoners on the prisoner alert list. The next highest is Eritrea with 4 (this does not take into account the vast population differences).
  • The U.S. Human Rights Report has listed China’s status on human rights violation as “poor,” “a country of particular concern, committing “serious violations” and “worse” for a decade (and that’s just the last decade).
  • The Freedom House Freedom in the World report has had China at the bottom 1/4 of the list and consistently “Not Free” scoring the worst possible score on political rights and worst or next-to-worse score on civil liberties since 1973 when they began the report.  Where’s the US?  The top 16 with the best possible score every year in political rights and civil liberties and consistently “Free.”  Imagine that!
  • Then there’s the whole one-child policy in China and the history of government-forced abortions that I’m not even going to go into here.

And China has the gall to bring up Arizona’s new immigration law?  They know our president, I must say, if they knew that red herring would work so well.

Do we apologize for America?  Do we apologize for the Christian principles and code of ethics for which she stands?  Do we apologize for the freedom she gives to her citizens and strives to attain for others? Do we apologize for the financial blessings her citizens gain through a strong work ethic?   Do we apologize for her speedy response to those in need both at home and in disasters around the world?

I say no!  God has incredibly blessed us as a nation and as I sing “God Bless America” this coming Memorial Day, 2010, I will sing it as an expression of gratitude and a pleading prayer that God would continue to grant us His mercy and blessing on this “land of the free.”  I can guarantee you I will not be apologizing for my country.

Mourning the loss of a Pro-Family President

This week the Polish people and the entire world mourn the loss of Polish President Lech Kaczynski, his wife and 94 others.    Many have eulogized President Kacznski for his leadership of Poland.  However, today I received a most interesting press release about this European national leader, highlighting an aspect of President Kaczynski’s leadership that is most definitely not being talked about in the mainstream media.

Wisconsin Family Action’s friends at The Howard Center and its World Congress of Families provide international leadership in the pro-family movement.  Their biennial World Congress of Families features leaders from around the world who support and champion the natural family–married moms and dads and their biological or adopted children.  In 2007,  Congress IV was held in Warsaw, Poland, and President Kaczynski was a patron of the event because he was a champion of the natural family.

Larry Jacobs, Managing Director of World Congress of Families, says,

“‘President Kaczynski was one of the strongest pro-family leaders in Europe….Despite intense pressure from the European Union, he stood firm for the right to life. The late president also opposed the legalization of prostitution and the normalization of homosexuality.’” 

During the Congress at Warsaw, when International Secretary Allan Carlson recognized President Kaczynski, the President responded by saying,

“I accept with satisfaction the kind words…about Poland as the bastion of strong faith and strong families in the increasingly laicizing Europe whose inhabitants are getting older.” 

There’s no doubt in my mind that it is this strong pro-natural family leadership that resulted in the following observation in an Associated Press article today regarding the official national mourning for the Polish president: 

 “Polish television broadcast live images of mourners walking by the coffins. Many were families with children, parents and grandparents. Each coffin was flanked by a pair of soldiers, standing crisp and stonelike.” (Emphasis added.)

I can’t help but wonder if any of our current elected officials or candidates for office this fall are recognized in their own community, state or nation as being pro-family—outspokenly so, unashamedly so.   President Kaczynski was beloved of his people.  He understood that the country of Poland is only as strong as its natural families and worked to strengthen and protect them.  What is true of Poland, is true for Wisconsin and the United States.

Changing Wisconsin—One Community at a Time

Wisconsin Family Council’s radio commentary, “Wisconsin Family Connection,” for the week of April 12, 2010:

It’s about this community organizing thing.  Yes, I know Barack Obama and his “community organizing” background and ACORN with its nefarious operations now make everyone run for cover when anyone dares to even breathe those words.  And that’s not good, because getting people informed, inspired and involved in their communities is American.  It’s how we have made deep and long-lasting changes in America for most of our history.  Real change always comes from the bottom up, one marriage, one family, one church, one community, one state at a time.

Read or listen to full commentary.

After Elections and Beyond Tea Parties

Spring Election is over and the big Madison Taxpayer Tea Party is just around the corner on Tax Day, Thursday, April 15.  Did the Tea Parties make any difference in Tuesday’s election?  Will the Tea Party next week, and other such events, make any difference in this fall’s elections?  Looking back, it’s hard to know if they made a difference this past Tuesday, but we can ensure they make a difference in November.  However, that difference will not happen unless Tea Party energy is converted into community action.

Wisconsin Family Action and its Changing Wisconsin – One Community At A Time seminars is a sure way to convert rally energy into community difference-making.  Without people owning their own community and making a difference from the ground up, the Tea Party energy will surely dissipate.  WFA’s Changing Wisconsin seminars are designed to give citizens the knowledge, the tools, and the leadership to ensure that they can indeed make a difference in this fall’s elections and beyond.

Not only are we offering this seminar, but we’re also offering an online forum (you’ll need to create a log-in for this interactive site) for grassroots to be involved with helpful hints and valuable resources and other ways you can get involved with people across the state.

Even if you’ve never been to a Tea Party, or if you’ve been to every one in the state, you can make a difference not only this fall, but for decades to come.  Learn how you can become a part of changing Wisconsin one community at a time by contacting us at 866-849-2536 or info@wifamilyaction.org.

Parents: Do you know where your children are—on the Internet?

From this week’s “Wisconsin Family Connection,”

Parents repeatedly say that laws against online predators should be fully enforced, that we need to do everything we can to protect children, who are going to be online, sometimes without the adult supervision they need, even though all efforts have been taken to prevent such a scenario.  Many think that local District Attorneys don’t take action quickly enough or bring charges as often as they should and that such predators aren’t punished severely enough.

Some of that perception may start to change here in Wisconsin.  Last week, a new bill was introduced in the state legislature that is attempting to tighten up Wisconsin’s online child predator law.  Recently Attorney General JB Van Hollen joined State Representative Tony Staskunas, a Democrat from West Allis, at the West Allis Police Department to publicly announce the introduction of Rep. Staskunas’s bill that will close some important loopholes. 

Read full transcript of this radio commentary
Listen to the mp3

Anti-family omnibus spending bill

The Heritage Foundation found 12 anti-family provisions in the 2010 Omnibus Appropriations bill, which Congress passed and the president signed into law late last year.  These “gifts” have gone largely unreported.  However, their impact will be felt for decades.  Summarized, they are as follows:

  1. Elimination of abstinence education.
  2. Spreading the wealth.
  3. Needle exchange
  4. Planned Parenthood funding.
  5. United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA).
  6. International family planning.
  7. Limiting free speech.
  8. Ending the D.C. Scholarship Program.
  9. Public funding of abortion.
  10. Taxpayer-financed domestic partner benefits.
  11. Legalized medical marijuana.
  12. Needle exchange for drug abusers in D.C. with restrictions lifted regarding proximity to schools, day cares & youth centers.

We express our gratitude to Heritage for wading through a law of this nature to figure out some of the more important details. 

If you want a mind-boggling experience, just read the outline of the law and click on a few of the topics.  If you scroll through the list of departments, agencies, programs, etc., you’ll get some idea of where your tax money is spent.  As I looked through the list, I was struck with the “National Institute of …” items.  I opened several and found that literally billions of dollars are being spent on such things as aging, arthritis, and deafness through these National Institutes, all creations of Congress.  Imagine what the “gift list” would look like if all the “goodies” had been found in this euphemistically named “appropriations bill”!

Milwaukee GOP votes down resolution advocating repeal of “Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell” policy

Wisconsin Family Action has heard unofficially that at its annual caucus this morning, the Milwaukee County Republican Party overwhelmingly voted down the proposed resolution that urged Congress to repeal the current “Don’t Ask; Don’t Tell” policy in the military.   Our source tells us that it was obvious a number of concerned and active citizens had called in urging the chairman and others to defeat this resolution.   We’ll post any official reporting we find from the caucus this morning as they become available.  Right now, nothing is posted publicly.

A couple of observations about this issue and some of the comments that have been posted on the blog where we broke this news:

1)  Someone noted in a comment that it is easier to sit on the sidelines and complain than to get involved.  That is absolutely correct!  Wisconsin Family Action (WFA) has a long history of urging people to get involved in the system in any number of ways.  Being involved with a political party at the county level is an excellent way to have a say and be involved in important decisions.  For political parties in Wisconsin, county chapters are incredibly important, as they are the ones that forward resolutions to the state party and help to shape the platform and the resolutions in the platform.  In addition, these local groups can be tremendously helpful to candidates by providing feet, hands, voices and money that are desperately needed during campaigns.  This resolution in this caucus today highlights the need for good people to be involved. 

2)  Another comment noted that this resolution was only proposed; that when we let people know about it, it was not a done deal.  That’s certainly true.  The comment went on to say, basically, that this is America; and such resolutions are part of the way we do government.  The entity considering such resolutions has the wherewithal to approve or disapprove them.  Again, that is true.   WFA is not ignorant of the way we do government in America, nor are we ignorant of how the resolution process works in such organizations as the Milwaukee County Republican Party.  It is also true that the resolution would likely have been defeated had we never let the general public know that it was on the docket for the caucus today. 

However, we let the general public know about this issue because of the particular resolution and the particular position.  When a local manifestation of a political party is considering a resolution that is in direct violation of the national party platform (see “Personnel Policies” under “National Security”), we believe it is appropriate that the public be made aware.  There are many Republicans in Milwaukee County who might not be part of the county party but consider themselves staunch party loyalists or even just “mostly Republican.”  However they view themselves on the spectrum of party loyalty, these folks deserve to know what the local party is doing.  Beyond that, they have every right to weigh in with the county party leadership to express their opinion.   But they won’t make their opinions known if they don’t know what is happening in the organization.  Yes, we agree; if they really cared, they’d join the county party and attend meetings.  And, frankly, we hope that from this specific instance a number of people in Milwaukee County will get more involved with the local Republican party or the party of their choice.   That would be a double victory, to be sure.

To those who took time to call Chairman David Karst, thank you for your concern and for your involvement.  We hope you will find yourselves involved in other ways, especially as we move through this critical election year.